Security is all too often treated as a purely compliance-driven exercise. This isn’t advisable in any industry, but it is particularly damaging for those that fall under critical infrastructure frameworks. Ports, and,
Security is all too often treated as a purely compliance-driven exercise. This isn’t advisable in any industry, but it is particularly damaging for those that fall under critical infrastructure frameworks. Ports, and, by extension, the dredging operations that maintain and expand shipping lanes, are the backbone of global trade, underpinning essential supply lines.
Security threats and workplace distributions therefore carry repercussions that extend far beyond any individual location, and facilitate a response that goes beyond passive monitoring and reactive measures. Both the US Coast Guard and the International Maritime Organization stress the importance of preventative measures and informed responses that allow critical operations to continue undisturbed. Balancing safety, continuity and compliance is only possible through strategic security planning.
The complicated risk profile of maritime sites
Though ports and dredging sites are, at least on paper, completely different in their construction, function and security needs, there is more overlap than there first appears. Both are largely exposed to and concerned with aquatic traffic, and feature shifting work zones with frequent transfers of sensitive cargo and equipment. These common vulnerabilities are important to recognize; however, the essential considerations lie in the differences between them.
Dredging sites are dynamic by nature,
Content Original Link:
" target="_blank">
